洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨

sho696969

洛杉机华人区爬藤探讨
( ?. B# S9 I6 x; r! X
来源Aresident于2011-05-01
4 u; K# F5 n; Q( L% D

最近小孩小学毕业，我也开始对洛杉机华人区高中开始研究。不怕诸位砸砖，我是比较热衷爬大藤。现在和大家分享一些信息，抛砖引玉。信息不全，请洛杉机华人朋友多多补充。我心目中的大藤含五所大学，Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT, Princeton.洛杉机好的私高，有Polytech, Harvard Westlake, and Chadwick,很难考进，学费较高。洛杉机华人区，学区好的有Whitney High (Cerritos), San Marino, Arcadia, South Pasadena, Walnut, Diamond Bar, University High (Irvine)，Parlos Verdes (Peninsula High and Parlos Verdes High), La Canada. 这些学校很多不公布爬藤报喜榜，所以我的信息支离破碎，请大家补充。Whitney High在南加公立高中排名第一，需选拔入学，亚裔众 多(74.9% Asian, 7.3% White), 2010年高三有169名学生,爬大藤方面，是3 accepted by Stanford and 1 by Yale，其余可能是0，似乎难以匹配南加第一的名头。San Marino是南加传统白人富人区，只有single family house,不过现在已沦陷，成了亚裔富人区，高三约282学生,约63% Asian and 28% white。2010年有3 for Stanford and 2 for Yale，比想象中华人西区第一名校有些距离。Arcadia应是华人西区第二名校，人口涵盖很多富人，中产，及少数新移民， 也有小孩在上学而父母在国内的。学生众多，高三约887人。69% Asian and 18% white. 2010年有1 for Harvard, 2 for MIT, 3 for Princeton, 3 for Stanford, and 2 for Yale.Walnut and Diamond Bar是华人东区名校，不过我没能找到爬藤数据。Parlos Verdes离华人中心区较为远，华人较不熟悉，Peninsula High 2010年有580高三学生，39% Asian and 45% Caucasian，6 for Harvard, 5 for MIT, 5 for Princeton, 10 for Stanford, and 3 for Yale.整体而言我有以下观察：华人占多数的高中名校，以Whitney High, San Marino High, and Arcadia High 为代表，1。似乎爬藤比例并不高，与国内的名校如人大附中爬北清差距较大。2。过去十年似乎爬藤有滑落趋势。 原因是什么呢？我有以下猜测：1.藤校一般较注重综合素质如领袖能力和社区服务，又讲究学生的独特性如某方面的特殊才能（体育，艺术，研究），会不会是我 们华人家长太注重成绩(GPA and SAT)，而忽略了全面发展？2。种族因素。可能顶级私立大学就是不想招太多亚裔？请大家讨论。

$ M) Y9 x# ^& C+ R
- @  Q8 l7 Z. c3 |
. u2 [7 T; P) Z) V4 |: B$ t3 G补充：
1 r# Y* b& w+ t8 J' |
Top 25 of America's Best High Schools - Gold Medal Rank

+ _& B% }$ c: B! D. z1 z& |1. Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology

9 U4 d2 W4 b/ J% kLocation: Alexandria, VA
Enrollment: 1,805
; g6 r7 O8 C; h( O% IEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 1.3
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 4.9
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 6.9
# F3 U& F. F/ j* Y. pCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
3 M+ ^8 a+ R3 k
  B$ _7 v4 w; n4 }: C- z7 Q/ ~, l3 d2. International Academy
: }/ J3 y" p( S4 E6 z! _
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI
7 i/ V2 ~+ G3 d5 O7 [8 w6 nEnrollment: 157
1 h1 }  d. Q$ cEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.6
; H% K  g+ T& O0 ^, V0 dMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 3.2
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.7
$ H% r" ~5 l3 B+ }0 aCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
; ^4 y9 _" L$ a1 g/ c
3. Whitney High School
* c5 Y7 E& R: w/ ~1 R1 d
Location: Cerritos, CA
Enrollment: 984
, N8 w$ H0 Y* `  j, J3 j  ^Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 11.0
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 11.5
% i' C2 F: P( d( PQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.1
2 f' Y( i. J! k0 H, nCollege Readiness Index: 100.0

* x' ^) z3 Q$ ]7 ^6 M4. Oxford Academy

% \% a+ ?; X+ K5 ]6 \# ^Location: Cypress, CA
8 z2 }+ u% k& m$ k  v: q1 ^Enrollment: 1.021
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 19.0
# ~6 E& q! i5 R4 N( MMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 12.7
) b% k3 L$ V/ wQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.0
College Readiness Index: 100.0

5. School for the Talented and Gifted at Yvonne A. Ewell Townview Center
/ z5 A5 J. t* a! h9 \
Location: Dallas, TX
+ ~7 q% v0 d4 {) ?4 ?Enrollment: 209
* [% W: P9 C2 m% D, r* q% O6 Z; _6 Y6 S  yEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 24.9
, ~8 Q# l( r8 e1 S% J% y5 u+ {4 J  n2 ZMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 51.2
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 8.0
* D& |! m) R  @) ?! |( |! h$ L5 eCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
( g# F6 f: t: x, `
6. Newcomers High School
2 l) y5 ]# j1 f7 ~
Location: Long Island City, NY
Enrollment: 1,016
  \! N/ C% c6 a2 W8 E4 W6 W# h5 `Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 79.0
. v9 @8 i0 D* ]4 a, q+ O1 M* ~$ DMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 60.7
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 1.6
6 }3 y. R4 [7 m  D, H: J: u7 t  |College Readiness Index: 100.0
- f: b: D. C2 y% W% N- D) [
7. Pacific Collegiate School
+ s4 W( R  Z- z; y
$ {9 k6 d" L. {. v* r- r, Y6 S+ uLocation: Santa Cruz, CA
4 t" Z0 z; _& {Enrollment: 383
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 8.4
. B: L0 O5 t  ]" ^. J4 [Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.5
' K$ Q* v# X  W! v& H" lCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
9 F/ _! X. Q- L+ c
8. School of Science and Engineering Magnet
1 U- d" z. L) K0 N# j0 m
Location: Dallas, TX
Enrollment: 391
( T8 Z. E; z8 s0 W0 dEconomically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 48.3
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 72.4
7 Q# W; t0 }6 ~$ b8 DQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 5.1
- F% g8 h! c6 X% M- o9 y; FCollege Readiness Index: 100.0
; I- i9 i; p% t, c5 X( C
- t( C9 o8 G% Z4 K+ R/ ]3 R' C( v+ |1 K9. BASIS Tucson

- V: }' V; g$ a3 V! k! q1 ^Location: Tucson, AZ
Enrollment: 527
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 0.0
Minority Enrollment (% of Total): 24.9
Quality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 4.7
0 [, B% g& f. V3 I: h9 |College Readiness Index: 100.0

6 Y0 b2 M) v6 y% V+ E0 W10. International School

. |6 r+ v" e; o% j4 j2 ^9 j* t1 J" _Location: Bellevue, WA
/ s1 W% Q, ~, NEnrollment: 509
Economically Disadvantaged Students (% of Total Enrollment): 3.6
1 q% N$ Q6 S" U; w! U; `& }) GMinority Enrollment (% of Total): 1.7
$ c% o$ ]; I4 j/ sQuality-Adjusted Exams Per Test Taker: 3.8
College Readiness Index: 100.0

飞鸟7

路过来看看．．．．．．．






2 ~, v* D' a# y6 F  S* _
' S, g2 n# v+ C) R/ K( ]
6 i( K9 \. w" Q8 G
苹果iPhone5报价